The court permitted the tape recorded statement into evidence.
Crawford v washington rule.
Because it was pre recorded crawford could not cross examine the statement.
November 10 2003 decided.
Syllabus opinion scalia concurrence rehnquist html version pdf version.
Written and curated by real attorneys at quimbee.
Petitioner was tried for assault and attempted murder.
Washington supreme court of the united states.
The jury convicted crawford for assault.
Hundreds of law school topic related videos from.
Washington case brief rule of law.
Html version pdf version.
To be confronted with the witnesses against him 1 this protection applies to the states by way of the fourteenth amendment 2 3in crawford v.
During crawford s trial prosecutors played for the jury his wife s tape recorded statement to the police describing the stabbing.
Statement of the facts.
Certiorari to the supreme court of washington.
W here testimonial statements are at issue the only indicium of reliability sufficient to satisfy constitutional demands is confrontation facts.
2d 424 54 p 3d 656 reversed and remanded.
Petitioner stabbed a man who allegedly tried to rape hi.
The state sought to introduce a recorded statement that petitioner s wife sylvia had made during police interrogation as evidence that the stabbing was not in self defense.
Washington case brief rule of law.
The new crawford rule.
Html version pdf version.
The prosecution tried to introduce a recorded statement by crawford s wife where she described the stabbing.
Petitioner was tried for assault and attempted murder.
36 2004 147 wash.
Washington the court radically revamped the.
Washington 02 9410 541 u s.
Crawford was charged with attempted murder and assault of a man who he alleged tried to rape his wife.
Every bundle includes the complete text from each of the titles below.
36 2004 united states supreme court case facts key issues and holdings and reasonings online today.
36 2004 is a united states supreme court decision that reformulated the standard for determining when the admission of hearsay statements in criminal cases is permitted under the confrontation clause of the sixth amendment the court held that cross examination is required to admit prior testimonial statements of witnesses who have since become unavailable.
Testimonial statements cannot be used against a defendant who is not given the opportunity to confront the.
